|
The "Standing Tall" land-use research
study initially was conducted as an academic exercise. It was
NOT designed as a
concrete architectural plan, but rather as an investigation of the feasibility of
reconstructing two 110-story towers with a diagonal offset at Ground
Zero.
As a Lower Manhattan
resident in the aftermath of 9/11, Berzon listened to the local
community voice its support for rebuilding, and he became curious when
Port Authority officials declared it impossible to resurrect the fallen
towers elsewhere on the site. More than a matter of shifting buildings
around like chess pieces on a 16-acre game board, any legitimate master
plan would demand the commercial buildings be functionally integrated
with the necessary underground infrastructure. As it turned out, there was
such a viable configuration permitting new Twin Towers.
|
|
|
12ptSIZED.jpg) |
|
|
|
18ptSIZED.jpg) |
 |
|
The
Berzon Report, released before officials unveiled the first
Libeskind-Childs vision for the Freedom Tower, alerted the media to
Berzon's preliminary collated findings. Chief among them was that the
official poll numbers used to validate Daniel Libeskind as Ground Zero's
"democratically elected" master planner didn't add up. Berzon
also conducted a computer re-scaling of Libeskind's signature skyline
image and discovered the architect had grossly exaggerated the heights
of his buildings in the rendering, promoting a much taller restored
skyline than his plan would actually offer. |
|
|
|
|
|
12ptSIZED.jpg) |
|
|
|
18ptSIZED.jpg) |
 |
|
In
response to feedback from the 2003 Report, Berzon produced a media
primer of sorts, for the first time centrally compiling
dozens of inexplicable irregularities in the rebuilding process, and
summarizing the position of every significant constituency with a vested
interest in the rebuilding outcome. At the request of various advocacy
groups, a limited number of copies also were bound and made available to the public
through this Web site under the title, "The Ground Zero Rebuilding
Scandal."
The monograph ultimately concluded that
the international design competition for the new World Trade Center had
been rigged before it ever began. More importantly, after receiving
copies of the monograph, several "insiders" in the rebuilding
process came forward to offer Berzon the full details of how and why
the competition had been rigged, telling stories of unexposed bribery,
graft, and fraud. This prompted Berzon to team with New York-based
syndicated columnist Deroy Murdock to write a book bringing these
travesties to light (see 2006).
|
|
|
|
18ptSIZED.jpg) |
18ptSIZED.jpg) |
|
The
media monograph of 2004 explicitly
concluded that, upon attempting to create blueprints for the
Libeskind-Childs "Windmill" Freedom Tower,
engineers would find the structure technically and economically unviable.
Fully one year later, in May 2005, every conclusion proved true in a
moment of public humiliation, when officials acknowledged the tower would
need to be redesigned.
As
architects reworked the Freedom Tower, New Yorkers widely supported an
alternative campaign by pop culture developer Donald Trump to rebuild an
updated version of the original complex. Berzon earlier had provided background
information and current site plans to structural engineer Kenneth Gardner, whose model for
replacement Twin Towers was endorsed by Trump on national
television in March 2005.
|
|
|
|
18ptSIZED.jpg) |
18ptSIZED.jpg) |
|
Berzon
and co-author Deroy Murdock finished the manuscript for their
collaborative book, "Sex, Lies and Ground Zero," detailing the
as-yet unreported scandals swirling behind the rebuilding effort. Their
agent in New York currently is in talks with publishers to arrange a
2006 release date.
On May 1, 2006, Berzon appeared as a
testimonial expert on Penn & Teller's television show,
"Bulls#@t!" The program, which airs on Showtime, combines
documentary journalism with the comedic duo's editorialized commentary
to produce biting exposés on controversial topics in American culture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12ptSIZED.jpg) |